Friday, May 31, 2019

Bullying in our Schools Essay -- Violence Education Bullies Essays

Bullying in our Schools Bullies are an inextricable element of classroom culture, and they have been since coarse before it occurred to an educational expert to author a study about them. For a long time, the attitude toward ballyrag was that it is simply a natural subtract of the school experience with so many children together, some would say it is unavoidable that that it was mostly harmless and that the children would grow out of it. The events of April 20th, 1999 demonstrated just how monstrous that way of thinking was. Every American remembers the shooting that occurred that day at columbine High School in Littleton, CO Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold opened fire on their classmates, thirteen of whom died of their injuries. Although the mass media jumped to blame the tragedy on violent video games and music, most local sources mentioned that Harris and Klebold had constantly been the victims of bullies, some of whom were among the deceas ed. The media quickly picked up the trail and direct with their new story victims of bullying had brutally fought back against their tormentors. Appropriately, there was a national outcry parents demanded to know what could be done to prevent another Columbine from happening in their childrens schools. Experts testified on national television, discussing what needed to be done to rectify the situation. The dialogue eventually closed, and, as it often goes, schools maintained the stipulation quo. When the outrage died down, the pressure was lifted from schools shoulders, and their impetus to affect change was removed. Pressure must be reapplied to accomplish this necessary goal of reducing (if not eliminating) bullying in our school system. ... ...he elimination of bullying in our schools should be a prominent nationwide goal. Not only does it generally inhibit the performance of victims, but it also can have much more explosive, pernicious effects, such as the Columbi ne massacre of 1999. It should be the priority of educators everywhere to do whatever they can to ensure the safety and academic success of our students, and one of the first necessary steps in that uphill battle is to educate them in how to entertain themselves from bullies. Until we as a society have done this, our main duty to our students, our children, will remain unfulfilled.WORKS CITEDColumbine High School massacre. http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbine_High_School_massacreIngram, Scott. Why Bullies transport Badly. Current Health Nov 2000. 20-1.Nudo, Lori. Fighting the Real Bullies. Prevention Nov 2004. 123-4.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Ancient Greeks :: essays research papers

HesiodWorks and Days, c. 750 BCFirst of all, get a house, and a cleaning wo human and an ox for the plough--a break ones back woman and not a wife, to follow the oxen as well--and make everything ready at home, so that you may not name to ask of another, and he refuse you, and so, because you are in lack, the season pass by and your work come to nothing. StraboGeographia circa 550 BCEAnd the temple of Aphrodite at Corinth was so rich that it owned more than than a thousand templesSlaves---prostitutes---whom both free men and women had dedicated to the goddess. And therefore it was in like manner on account of these temple-prostitutes that the city was crowded with people and grew rich for instance, the enrapture captains freely squandered their money, and hence the proverb, "Not for every man is the voyage to Corinth."AntiphonOn the Choreutes, c. 430 BCESo powerful is the compulsion of the law, that even if a man slays one who is his own chattel i.e., his slave and wh o has none to avenge him, his fear of the ordinances of god and of man causes him to purify himself and withhold himself from those places prescribed by law, in the hope that by so doing he will best avoid disaster.DemosthenesAgainst Timocrates. c. 350 BCEIf, gentlemen of the jury, you will turn over in your minds the question what is the difference between being a slave and being a free man, you will find that the biggest difference is that the body of a slave is made responsible for all his misdeeds, whereas corporal punishment is the refinement penalty to inflict on a free man. AristotleThe Politics---On Slavery, c. 330 BCELet us first speak of master and slave, looking to the needs of practical life and also seeking to attain some better theory of their relation than exists at present. Property is a theatrical role of the household, and the art of acquiring property is a part of the art of managing the household for no man can live well, or indeed live at all, unless he be pro vided with necessaries. And so, in the arrangement of the family, a slave is a living possession, and property a of such instruments and the slave is himself an instrument which takes precedence of all other instruments. The master is only the master of the slave he does not belong to him, whereas the slave is not only the slave of his master, but wholly belongs to him.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

DEEP WOODS :: essays research papers

Dusk has fallen, and now its just starting to penetrate the canopy of the forest. The trees seem to be dancing to the music of the evening ginger nut and the gentle rustle of leafs compliment the overall atmosphere. The songs of birds have been totally replaced by an orchestra of crickets and other insects, and I seem to be their sole audience. My eyes peer into the sombreness trying to make out what lies ahead, without much success. Soon I get in that I have to let my other senses take over in localise continue on. I tread onto what seems to be a sea of moss that covers a large portion of the forest floor, forming a thick green carpet. Each of my steps makes a green depression, which quickly fill up and erase all evidence of my passing . The soft texture of this carpet invites me to discard my shoes and I do so without much of a second thought. The green sea quickly engulfs my feet and I indulge on the velvety texture that brushes them. Reluctantly, I leave my carpet of moss a nd make an unsuccessful attempt to find my shoes. I venture onto a thin trail that is suffocated with undergrowth and slowly, start making my way go through it. I do not seem to feel any discomfort due to the lack of shoes on the contrary the feeling of the soft moist earth under my feet is an unforgettable experience.The stars are just only starting to peer through the intricate patchwork of leafs and light patches of the forest floor. Fireflies dance uniform fairies and ignite tiny patches of light, which randomly appears and then suddenly disappears. I stop for a moment, captivated by this dances beauty, and then I realize that I have made little progress since I came onto the path. My attention shifts back too my walk and I continue on.The aroma of pine peers into my nostrils and attempts to bewitch me. Its spell is abruptly broken by the unmistakable sound of flowing water. I get lured to a spot where the tall giants of the forest have separate to make way for a small strea m. The reflection caused my the moons light causes its surface to emit a queer silver glow which causes the shorts of nearby trees to look like foreboding dark phantoms. Even in this light, I am able to make out the array of smooth pebbles that hatch the streams bed.

Humanitys Fall in John Miltons Paradise Lost :: Milton Paradise Lost Essays

Humanitys Fall in Paradise Lost The original sin that led to humanitys fall in the Garden of Eden is by far the worst sin committed by humankind. It is this sin that led to future sins. This original sin must be emphasized by writers to pull the evil involved in it. In writing Paradise Lost, John Milton recognizes this fact and uses a variety of literary techniques to stress the evil in the recital over the good. The techniques used include a series of parallels with the parallel between good and evil being first and foremost as well, as remainder to keep the poem in balance. Paradise Lost is a poem essentially about the origin of sin and evil, as a result, Milton presents evil in a more coercive manner than good. dickens and his followers in Paradise Lost are presented as being more evil than divinity fudge and his disciples are good. God addresses the tidings to be in the likeness of himself in Book three by saying, The radiant image of his glory sat, his only Son .(Bk. 3, 63-64). Although this implies that the Son is a model of perfection as is God, it does not clarify it by stating it outright. Milton definitely portrays Satans evil in Book four by asserting that Satan is hell and that evil is his good because good has been lost to him. (Bk. 4, lines 75, 108-110). Satans moral state further decays in Book nine as detailed in a soliloquy at the beginning of the book by Satan. Satan recognizes his descent into bestiality after once being in contention with the gods to sit on top of the hierarchy of angels. He is unhappy with this foul descent and in turn wants to take out his grief on humanity. Despite recognizing that revenge last becomes bitter, Satan wants to make others as miserable as he is. It is i n destruction that he finds comfort for his ceaseless thoughts. (Bk. 9, lines 129-130, 163-165). Satan is described at length in an epic simile that compares his great size to that of mythical figures. This simile drags on for s ixteen lines of direct comparison. This comparison to mythical figures makes the reader call back more about the subject therefore invoking more thought about

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Free Speech -- Freedom of Speech Essays

In order to find truth to any(prenominal)thing, one must make multiple suggestions, ask some(prenominal) questions, and sometimes ponder the un give tongue toable. Without doing so, there would be no process of elimination therefore, truth would be virtually unattainable. Now, in our attempts to either find truth, express our beliefs and opinions, or generally use the rights we ar given constitutionally, we ar often being criticized and even reprimanded. Our freedom to voice our opinion(s) is being challenged, as critics of free speech argon taking offense to what seems like anything and everything merely controersial and arguably prejudice. As large number continue to strive for a nation free of prejudice and discrimination, where everyone is equal, beneficial and happy, they overlook the outcome of creating such an environment. Without different beliefs, theories, opinions and controversy, we will never advance as a people. All we would be left to do is think and speak the sa me, and believe the same beliefs. Our minds will no longer be able to run wild with brilliant, and sometimes controversial, thoughts though, even if they did, we wouldnt be able to vocalize any of it. Although it is comforting to think that there will come a time when nobody will say or do anything offensive and prejudice is diminished, the ingenuousness is that a nation without the freedom to voice anything controversial, opinionated , and even prejudice, is hardly desirable as we will be deprived of intellectual freedom and truth. It is easygoing to wonder whether there really is such a thing as free speech better yet, complete free speech. (Free meaning free and without consequences) Sure, the majority of us say whatever we want, when we want, to whom we want, but there are some cases where our speech is hardly free. There has been many instances where complications and debates have risen over borderline comments, words, etc. People are being told that they have the ability to say whatever they want and believe in however, many people are facing lawsuits and even consequences for doing so. With that give tongue to, one could wonder whether there is inadequacy in our constitution that is allowing people to be reprimanded for practicing their rights. However, it is not al ports citizens who are being challenged by the government for abuse of free speech. In his essay, In Defense Of Prejudice, Jonathan Ra... ...solution is to ask which is more important reverseing language that could provoke or offend people (and thus prohibit any sort of opposition) or allow people to think out of the norm and different than what is considered morally acceptable? Conforming to censorship can only lead to silencing our voices and ultimately narrow our thoughts and minds. To risk hearing powerful voices in society because of who they may offend isnt worth it. It seems that people are being offended by comments that they allow to penetrate their self esteem and self respec t. Being secure enough in your personal beliefs and yourself is the best way to handle what may be considered offensive speech. Allow people to feel, think and speak differently for there is surely a time when we have said or will say something inciting to someone, regardless of whether it was purposeful or mistaken. We cannot allow such instances to constrain our right to voice our opinions. Censoring speech may prohibit citizens from speaking of unacceptable and provocative issues however, those feelings and beliefs will still linger. Although they wont be expressed verbally, they will inevitably be expressed one way or another.

Free Speech -- Freedom of Speech Essays

In order to find truth to anything, one must make multiple suggestions, beg many questions, and sometimes ponder the unspeakable. Without doing so, there would be no process of elimination therefore, truth would be virtually unattainable. Now, in our attempts to either find truth, dribble our beliefs and opinions, or generally use the rights we are given constitutionally, we are often world criticized and even reprimanded. Our independence to voice our opinion(s) is being challenged, as critics of free words are taking offense to what seems like anything and everything merely controversial and arguably preconception. As battalion continue to strive for a nation free of wrong and discrimination, where everyone is equal, safe and happy, they overlook the outcome of creating such an environment. Without different beliefs, theories, opinions and controversy, we will never advance as a citizenry. All we would be left to do is bet and speak the same, and believe the same beliefs. Our minds will no longer be able to run wild with brilliant, and sometimes controversial, thoughts though, even if they did, we wouldnt be able to joint any of it. Although it is comforting to think that there will come a time when nobody will say or do anything offensive and prejudice is diminished, the reality is that a nation without the freedom to voice anything controversial, opinionated , and even prejudice, is hardly desirable as we will be deprived of intellectual freedom and truth. It is easy to wonder whether there really is such a thing as free speech better yet, complete free speech. (Free meat unrestricted and without consequences) Sure, the majority of us say whatever we want, when we want, to whom we want, but there are some cases where our speech is hardly free. There has been many instances where complications and debates slang come up over borderline comments, words, etc. People are being told that they have the ability to say whatever they want and believe in however, many people are facing lawsuits and even consequences for doing so. With that said, one could wonder whether there is inadequacy in our constitution that is allowing people to be reprimanded for practicing their rights. However, it is not always citizens who are being challenged by the government for abuse of free speech. In his essay, In Defense Of Prejudice, Jonathan Ra... ...solution is to ask which is more important prohibiting language that could provoke or burst people (and thus prohibit any sort of opposition) or allow people to think out of the norm and different than what is considered morally acceptable? conformist to censorship can only lead to silencing our voices and ultimately narrow our thoughts and minds. To risk hearing powerful voices in society because of who they may offend isnt worth it. It seems that people are being offended by comments that they allow to penetrate their self esteem and self respect. Being secure enough in your personal beliefs an d yourself is the outperform way to handle what may be considered offensive speech. Allow people to feel, think and speak differently for there is surely a time when we have said or will say something inciting to someone, regardless of whether it was purposeful or mistaken. We cannot allow such instances to constrain our right to voice our opinions. Censoring speech may prohibit citizens from speaking of unacceptable and provocative issues however, those feelings and beliefs will still linger. Although they wont be expressed verbally, they will inevitably be expressed one way or another.